stopitsomemore: (Default)
[personal profile] stopitsomemore
So the contrary delights over at Slate discovered a trove of smut ebooks available for the Kindle. There are a couple of reasons this is totally precious, including but not limited to the fact that they seem to view this as a revelatory thing -- which dovetails nicely with the whole BREAKING: LADIES — SOMETIMES TWO LADIES — WATCH GAY PORN thing we discussed earlier. Also, the titillation factor here where they're discussing some of the stories that show up is kind of fantastic:

Take, for example, a novel called Office Slave, in which an attractive female CFO is found to be embezzling from her manufacturing company. Rather than go to prison, she agrees to her boss's demand to become the company's sex slave. She is forced to wear slutty (or no) clothing at work; he films her in intimate acts; he instructs male coworkers to beat her physically for perceived transgressions; and she has sex with everyone imaginable, including factory workers (to reward productivity gains), prospective customers (to secure new contracts), a coworker (as a retirement gift), teenage boys (who deliver lunch to the office), etc. And—whaddya know?—no matter how physically abused and mentally degraded she is, she finds she actually enjoys it.


I think there's the possibility that fandom has permanently rewired what my brain interprets as socially acceptable, because I read that description and my knee-jerk response was something along the lines of, "Yeah. So? There're like, 58 J2 AUs like this posted yesterday."

The more intriguing bit, I think, is this:

Presumably, some small percentage of women might be attracted to this material. But much can be adduced from reader comments, such as, "I don't see how any woman could enjoy this ... just seems like every man's fantasy."


Is it really? I see so many stories like this, or more graphic, floating around fandom, and the majority of the people reading, commenting, and going into the vapors or retreating to their bunks after reading are women. Is smut of this tier truly something that most women don't enjoy? To take a casual survey of fandom, we'd think this shit was as normal as a heady teenage romance. Is that just us? Or is this just Slate?
stopitsomemore: (Default)
[personal profile] stopitsomemore
As we have discussed many times in the past, porn is very important to the FG staff. So is Star Wars. So naturally, it would be very important to us to discuss the intersection of these two things in an unholy marriage:

Award-winning director Axel Braun announced today at the Geekscape Comic Con booth that he has started pre-production on Star Wars XXX: A Porn Parody, to be exclusively distributed by adult powerhouse Vivid Entertainment.

The ambitious project will mark Vivid's first foray into the increasingly popular 3D format, and is set for release in September 2011.

-- Source

It's apparently going to be the most expensive porn ever made, to which I say, "WE WILL SEE, AXEL BRAUN, WE SHALL SEE," as I clutch at my copy of Pirates and its sequel, Pirates II: Stagnetti's Revenge.
stopitsomemore: (Default)
[personal profile] stopitsomemore
I mean, I'm pretty sure everybody reading this knows that already but it looks like this is sort of revelatory news for even mainstays of liberal, birkenstock wearing, sexually liberated web co-ops (where we volunteer two days a week to get a 2 percent discount applied to our purchases of local turnips) like Jezebel and The Daily Beast.

To give you a quick overview: Annette Bening and Julianne Moore are starring — and getting rave reviews — in a little flick called The Kids Are All Right, about a pair of lesbians, their kids, and their kids' biological sperm donor father. By some accounts — though not all — it's a great movie for many virtues, apart from the fact that the leading characters have an interlude while watching some retro gay porn with dudes fucking on a car. (In case you're curious about what this retro dudes fucking on a car thing is, see here. Obviously, not safe for work, nor is anything else on Fleshbot, for the record.)

As a significant portion of slash fandom identifies as lesbian/queer/bisexual, this is hardly news to us, but apparently it’s been the source of much eyebrow raising elsewhere, as Jezebel notes. And yet, while the movie has sparked a conversation about lesbians enjoying gay male pornography, it hasn't really catalyzed into much of a discussion about women watching gay porn, or, regrettably, a larger discussion about female desire.

Slash fandom is the Galapagos Islands of female sexuality, and a plethora of unique species flourish here that would die if we lost our habitat. We have our jungles of kink memes and their forebears, the FQF; we have unique and delicate ecosystems of Livejournal community within Dreamwidth post that caters to every possible sexual need. In short, slash fandom is what the internet looks like if you have a dick.

For any girl who's gone looking for some gratification outside of our gated and self-selecting community of hedonists, you're going up against a gritty, shitty sahara of inevitable disappointment. Most of the pornography out there isn't made for you, isn't meant for you, and frankly, the XY-carriers in your life would probably be happier if you and his account at RedTube and YouJizz never crossed paths. There's a whole other essay that deserves to be written about the paradox of women being eternally the object and receiver of sexual desire and at once completely divorced from it; endlessly gagging for dick — or, in the case of popular erotic depictions of gay women: fists, ribbed dildos, anal plugs with sparkly shit at the handle, that sort of thing — and yet somehow completely excluded from wanting sex for ourselves.

Circling back to the basic point of girls and gay dudes fucking, there's probably a larger underlying psychology there, about why we enjoy watching hot men riding it until the wheels fall off, but to me, anyway, the question becomes, does it really matter? Obviously, I see this becoming a critical piece of scholarship for some deeply awesome psychology masters student, but in the practical world, I think the more important point isn't what women are getting off to, just that they're getting off, that female desire is being cultivated, being teased, that maybe this is some tiny indication — and it is hella tiny — that someone out there wants to tap my line of credit and start selling me porn.

But if the scene from The Kids Are All Right did remind us a lot of slash fandom as a whole — two women watching dudes fucking as a way of getting each other off is highly reminiscent of fandom’s perpetual lady circle jerk — the porn did not. It was so laughably awful — pornstaches! EXTREME MUSCLE DOMINATION! — as to be completely undeserving of being referred to with implicit capital letters as The Tape. We’re disappointed in you, Julianne Moore and Annette Bening, and we at FG, as discerning consumers of filth, thought:

They need our help. They need recommendations. We have trained our whole lives for this. If it is one thing we at FG can do, it is gay porn recommendations. )

And in conclusion, you should all be really grateful. The first draft of this piece started with this line: Whenever I start thinking about the geography of female desire it looks like a Salvador Dali painting, only guiltier.
stopitsomemore: (Default)
[personal profile] stopitsomemore
I don't know if you guys know, but around here at FG headquarters, we take porn really fucking seriously. To that ends, it's imperative that as soon as more information about this came out, I brought it to the world.

I'm sure everybody owns the classic porn parody, THE SEX FILES - A DARK XXX PARODY, which I described to someone as, "Oh my God, someone wrote an X-Files fanfiction and then they jacked some pornography into it and FILMED IT OH MY GOD IT IS LIKE HEAVEN DID YOU GUYS SEE THE PENCILS IN THE CEILING?" Translation: it's the best fucking porn parody ever done, and if you basically spent your years wishing Agents Scully and Mulder would just fuck already, this is kind of like candy to you. Trust me on this one: they even cast really convincing actors. What? Don't believe me? Here's the trailer:


Fair warning: it's mostly worksafe, but there's one blurred out ass-shot. To be fair, for a porn trailer, that's showing fucking remarkable restraint already.


If you enjoyed that, you're going to love the HELL out of its upcoming sequel, which apparently incorporates Marita, Diana Fowley (!!!), the Lone Gunmen (ten points from Gryffindor for whoever wrote that post on the website for not knowing offhand and immediately that the gunmen's names), and Krycek. This can only end in total fucking awesome.

To that ends, I finally have a reason to do a porn recap. It's like DOUBLE CHRISTMAS.
thatneedslube: (castle-dilf)
[personal profile] thatneedslube
Unlike most geeks, I absolutely adore 1960's Batman. It contributed heavily to my adoration of puns, bright colours, and 1960's Batgirl, who I honest to god hoped to be when I grew up complete with motorcycle, red wig, and occasional butler-assistance from Alfred.

Like most fangirls, I enjoy porn. It's just that usually it's literary porn not videos. In this case though, I might make an exception. I mean, this thing looks amazingly accurate in every way:



Click here if you can't see embeds.

The Daily What speculates that the entrance to the Batcave is the same one they used in the Adam West series, and man, if I didn't know that the original costumes were on display somewhere, I'd suspect they were using those, too.

So pluses: hot ladies, Batman, sexual tension with Robin, amazing puns and riddles, etc.
Negatives: ladies mean probably no hot Batman/Robin sexing, possibility of the Joker and Riddler having sex with ladies as well.

Hmmm, it's a tough call.
damngirl: (rob)
[personal profile] damngirl
So, [personal profile] stopitsomemore and I are fans of pornography in all its forms. So upon finding this gem and knowing my love of the Goddamn Batman, she could not resist in linking me, and by extension, all of you.

Photobucket


He's not fucking around. WATCH OUT.


It's remarkably SFW for a porn trailer, which is to say- I'm not sure it's a porn at all. In fact, it might actually be an educational video. DC Comics released a Super Dictionary in '78- it'll help us decode the 'plot' of this titillating pornography. (Note: I saw no tits.)

So we'll hunt him because he can take it. )

I've lost my freaking mind.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags